(d) Above, pp. 399, 400.

(e) As to the duty of the vendor to give up vacant possession on completion, see above, pp. 512, 515, 578; Engell v. Fitch, L. R. 4 Q. B. 659: Royal Bristol, etc.

Society v. Bomash, 35 Ch D. 390.

(f) Above, p. 584.

(g) Above, p. 608, and n, (q); Jacobs v. Revell, 1900, 2 Ch. 858; Re Packett and Smith's Contract, 1902, 2 Ch. 258.

Purchaser buying without inspection must accept patent, but not latent defects.

(h) Wilde v. Gibson, 1 H. L. C. 605, 632, 633 Joliffer v. Baker, 11 Q. B. D. 255: Clayton v. Leech, 41 Ch. D. 103; Soldo v. North Eastern Salt Co., 1905, 1 Ch. 326; above, pp. 66, 608, a. (q); below, Chap. XIV.Sec. 1. (i) Palmer v. Johnson, 13 Q.B.D. 361; above, pp. 65,66; see Deben-ham v. Sawbridge, 1901, 2 Ch. below, Sec. 4 of thsi Chapter.

(k) May v. Platt, l900, 1 Ch. 616; and see Debenhan v. Sawbridge, ubi sup.; below, Chap.

XIX ...

(l) De Lasaalle v. Guildford, 1901, 2 K. B. 215.

(m) Bowles v. Bound, 5 Ves. 508.

(n) Grant v. Munt, G. Coop. 173, 177; Keates v. Cadogan, 10 C. B. 591; Cook v. Waugh, 2 Giff. 201.

(o) Ashburner v. Sewett, 1891, 3 Ch. 405: Bee above, pp. n. (t) . 175, 176, 608, and n. (q).

39 (2)