This section is from the book "A Treatise On The Law Of Vendor And Purchaser Of Real Estate And Chattels Real", by T. Cyprian Williams. Also available from Amazon: A treatise on the law of vendor and purchaser of real estate and chattels real.
(d) Above, pp. 399, 400.
(e) As to the duty of the vendor to give up vacant possession on completion, see above, pp. 512, 515, 578; Engell v. Fitch, L. R. 4 Q. B. 659: Royal Bristol, etc.
Society v. Bomash, 35 Ch D. 390.
(f) Above, p. 584.
(g) Above, p. 608, and n, (q); Jacobs v. Revell, 1900, 2 Ch. 858; Re Packett and Smith's Contract, 1902, 2 Ch. 258.
Purchaser buying without inspection must accept patent, but not latent defects.
(h) Wilde v. Gibson, 1 H. L. C. 605, 632, 633 Joliffer v. Baker, 11 Q. B. D. 255: Clayton v. Leech, 41 Ch. D. 103; Soldo v. North Eastern Salt Co., 1905, 1 Ch. 326; above, pp. 66, 608, a. (q); below, Chap. XIV.Sec. 1. (i) Palmer v. Johnson, 13 Q.B.D. 361; above, pp. 65,66; see Deben-ham v. Sawbridge, 1901, 2 Ch. below, Sec. 4 of thsi Chapter.
(k) May v. Platt, l900, 1 Ch. 616; and see Debenhan v. Sawbridge, ubi sup.; below, Chap.
XIX ...
(l) De Lasaalle v. Guildford, 1901, 2 K. B. 215.
(m) Bowles v. Bound, 5 Ves. 508.
(n) Grant v. Munt, G. Coop. 173, 177; Keates v. Cadogan, 10 C. B. 591; Cook v. Waugh, 2 Giff. 201.
(o) Ashburner v. Sewett, 1891, 3 Ch. 405: Bee above, pp. n. (t) . 175, 176, 608, and n. (q).
39 (2)
 
Continue to: