In an action for commissions, it was admitted that defendant sold the property, and the court instructed that if plaintiff was a means of procuring a purchaser for the property, and defendant agreed to pay a reasonable commission for his services, or permitted plaintiff to render services under circumstances which would lead a reasonably prudent man to believe that plaintiff expected compensation therefor, the jury should find for the plaintiff. Held, that the instruction properly submitted the question whether the defendant agreed to pay plaintiff for his services, or permitted him to render them under circumstances leading a reasonably prudent man to believe compensation was expected. Bullock v. Menninger (Ky. Ct. App. '10), 125 S. W. 256; Brady v. Richey & Casey, 202 S. W. 170, - Tex. Civ. App. - . See also Sec. 931.