Where plaintiff made a contract by which he was to have the exclusive right for twenty days to effect a sale of defendant's farm, and the contract of purchase which he secured described the land as containing so many acres on which defendant resided, lying partly in one and partly in another town named, and bounded but on three sides, and concluded by stating that it was formerly known as the "Van Allen farm;" whereas it is designated as the "Owen's place" in defendant's contract, the variance is immaterial, as the description is sufficient to enable the land to be located, and it is not void for uncertainty, and the broker is entitled to commissions. Schultz v. Griffin, 8 N. Y. S. E. 332, reversed 121 N. Y. 294, 24 N". E. 480; Gifford v. Straub, 179 N. W. 600, - Wis. Sup. - . See also Secs. 59, 428a.