This section is from the book "Human Vitality And Efficiency Under Prolonged Restricted Diet", by Francis G.BENEDICT, Walter R. Miles, Paul Roth, And H. Monmouth Smith. Also available from Amazon: Human Vitality and Efficiency Under Prolonged Restricted Diet.
Although the morphological changes in blood observed for the fasting man previously studied in this Laboratory1 were relatively slight, it seemed desirable to secure certain evidence as to the blood with the subjects of the low-diet research, so as to contribute in every way possible to the general picture of the influence of a reduced diet. Accordingly, through the kind offices of Dr. George R. Minot, the services were enlisted of Miss Anna L. Gibson and Miss Myra B. Conover, the expert technicians of the Collis P. Huntington Memorial Hospital. Blood counts were made on both squads when they came to Boston for the biweekly experiments.
Additional information regarding the possible effect of the diet upon the blood is given by the fact that at no period throughout the test did the subjects appear to the examining physician as at all anemic. He saw them, however, only under artificial light. Dr. J. H. Kellogg, of the Battle Creek Sanitarium, when at the Laboratory on the last day of the research, thought the men appeared anemic. Professor G. B. Affleck, of the International Y. M. C. A. College, who was one of the coaches and instructors and saw the men in gymnasium suits and under the best daylight conditions, also thought the men looked anemic.
As was noted in the personal histories (see p. 49), one of the subjects, Gul, donated blood for transfusions at the Springfield Hospital, the amounts being on December 23, 100 c.c; on December 29, 50 c.c; on January 6, 90 c.c; and on January 17, 50 c.c, making a total amount of 290 c.c.
The data obtained from the blood examinations in this research are given in tables 74 and 75. These values may be compared with the statement of Loewy and Zuntz, who report "asa good sign" that in their study on themselves the determinations made by the Plesch hem-oglobinometer showed for both of them 110 per cent hemoglobin.
For the interpretation of the large number of blood counts made by Miss Gibson and Miss Conover, we are very much indebted to Dr. Minot, who has been good enough to contribute the appended report:
Boston, Mass., June 18, 1918. The data on the blood examinations made by Miss Gibson and Miss Conover, both expert technicians and nurses of the Collis P. Huntington Memorial Hospital, show in general, I think, that both Squads A and B developed during the course of the experiment a definite, though slight to mild, secondary anemia. In general, it is evident that both the hemoglobin and red count are reduced, and the color index tends to be lower than normal. (Eighty-five per cent or above for the hemoglobin is normal with the Sahli instrument used.) These findings are very slight in some instances, and quite marked in others, and more evident with Squad A than Squad B. In certain instances it may be noted that instead of a progressively falling red count, there occurs a slightly increased count following a previously lower count. This may be dependent upon a temporary concentration of the blood, or dependent perhaps upon an actual increase of cells which are relatively poor in hemoglobin, as told by their histological character and the fact that the hemoglobin did not significantly rise with the increased count. The relatively slight histological abnormalities noted about the red cells, the achromia, anisocytosis, occasionally polychromatophilia, are those associated with slight or mild secondary anemia.
1 Benedict. Carnegie Inat Wash. Pub. No. 203. 1915, p. 148.
The white counts, in general, average 9,500, but little higher than normal (normal average, 7,300). With Squad B, who had not been so long on reduced diet, the white counts showed no alteration. The evidence is therefore negative so far as the white counts alone are concerned.
The white cells are evidently of the normal types, but their normal proportion is disturbed. This is evidenced by the fact that the average per cent (36) and the average absolute number (3,400) of the lymphocytes are unusually high for individuals in this vicinity, the average normal lymphocyte count being 22 per cent (though the upper normal limit may be 40 per cent) and the average normal absolute count being 1,724.1 In Squad B, in certainly 8 out of 12 cases, the lymphocytes definitely increased, both relatively and absolutely, under observation, while, though variations occur in Squad A, the average lymphocyte count is certainly well above the normal average. This increase is perhaps at the expense of polynuclear neutrophile production, for the polynuclear per cent, both squads, averages 56 per cent, which is slightly lower than the normal average, 64 per cent. However, the average absolute number of polynuclears is not so significantly altered from their normal average (4,895) as are the lymphocytes. This increase of lymphocytes is not an unusual finding in chronic secondary anemia.
The other white cells show no definite significant alteration, though in some instances the eosinophiles are very slightly more numerous than normal. Satisfactory data concerning the blood platelets, the third formed element of the blood, originating from myelogenous tissue, are unfortunately lacking. One usually finds them increased in secondary anemia, although when associated with decreased blood formation, they may become decreased.
The secondary anemia present in these cases may be dependent, perhaps, in some manner upon a decreased rate of blood formation, possibly similar to that which occurs in myxedema.
It is interesting to speculate as to what might happen to the blood of these individuals if they were kept on this same diet for a considerably longer period of time. I am inclined to believe that, under such circumstances, a greater degree of secondary anemia than the most marked case shows would probably not occur, or that it would be but very slightly greater. In other words, it seems to me that their blood would stay at a new level, one which we would interpret as a mild secondary anemia. However, I think that, if for any considerable time the blood remained at this new level, it would probably be quite difficult, perhaps impossible, for it to return to its previous normal level, and that if it did return to normal, it would probably do so very slowly. This is because, from clinical experience, the blood of cases of chronic mild secondary anemia, dependent upon various minor causes, not infrequently improves only slightly following prolonged appropriate treatment. It would seem in some such instances as if some "trap had been sprung" which could not be entirely repaired to let the completely normal hemopoetic function take place again. This may be well seen in certain rather marked and unusual cases of anemia dependent upon chronic benzol poisoning - a drug which causes an aplastic type of anemia.
George R. Minot, M. D.
1 S. R. Miller, Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, 1914, 25, p. 317.
Subject and date. | Time. | Hemoglobin. (Sahli). | Total erythrocytea. | Total leucocytes. | Polymorphonuclear neutrophiles. | Differential counts. | Eosino-philes. | Remarks on erythrocytes. | |||||
Lymphocytes. | Mononuclears. | ||||||||||||
Total. | Per cent. | Total. | Per cent. | Total. | Per cent. | Total. | Per cent. | ||||||
Bro. | p. m. | p.ct. | millions. | ||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917.. | 8.20 | 80 | 4.568 | 8,400 | 5,124 | 61 | 2,520 | 30 | 756 | 9 | ... | ... | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 8.36 | 80 | 3.420 | 10,400 | 6,240 | 60 | 3,328 | 32 | 728 | 7 | 104 | 1 | Do. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 9.20 | 76 | 3.880 | 12,000 | 6,480 | 54 | 5,040 | 42 | 480 | 4 | ... | .. | Considerable achromia and slight anisocytosis. |
Feb. 918... | 7.40 | 78 | 3.840 | 8,000 | 4,160 | 52 | 3,200 | 40 | 560 | 7 | 80 | 1 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Can. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 7.20 | 80 | 3.856 | 14,000 | 9,800 | 70 | 2,940 | 21 | 980 | 7 | 280 | 2 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 19181.. | 9.25 | 72 | 3.200 | 12,000 | 7,560 | 63 | 3,600 | 30 | 720 | 6 | .. | .. | Do. |
Jan. 26, 1918s.. | 7.45 | 78 | 3.688 | 7,000 | 3,780 | 54 | 2,380 | 34 | 630 | 9 | 140 | 2 | Marked achromia and slight anisocytosis. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 7.20 | 72 | 5.080 | 12,800 | 7,424 | 58 | 4,608 | 36 | 768 | 6 | ... | .. | Slight achromia. |
Kon. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 8.30 | 76 | 5.368 | 6,000 | 3,300 | 55 | 2,400 | 40 | 180 | 3 | 120 | 2 | Considerable achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 7.15 | 74 | 4.280 | 9,000 | 5,850 | 65 | 2,610 | 29 | 540 | 6 | .. | .. | Do. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 8.15 | 78 | 4.480 | 9,200 | 5,980 | 65 | 2,760 | 30 | 368 | 4 | 92 | 1 | Slight achromia. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 8.00 | 78 | 4.832 | 9,600 | 6,144 | 64 | 2,688 | 28 | 576 | 6 | 192 | 2 | Do. |
Gar. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 8.50 | 80 | 5.976 | 16,000 | 7,200 | 45 | 6,560 | 41 | 1,280 | 8 | 960 | 6 | Slight achromia, polychromatophilia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 8.35 | 70 | 4.621 | 9,600 | 4,128 | 43 | 4,512 | 47 | 576 | 6 | 384 | 4 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 8.55 | 73 | 4.328 | 10,000 | 5,400 | 54 | 4,000 | 40 | 500 | 5 | 100 | 1 | Do. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 8.20 | 70 | 4.132 | 7,200 | 4,320 | 60 | 2,592 | 36 | 288 | 4 | .. | .. | Do. |
Gul. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 19173.. | 7.20 | 74 | 5.728 | 10,800 | 5,508 | 51 | 3,780 | 35 | 1,080 | 10 | 324 | 3 | Slight anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 9.05 | 76 | 4.480 | 10,800 | 5,940 | 55 | 3,888 | 36 | 432 | 4 | 540 | 5 | Considerable achromia. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 9.05 | 78 | 4.288 | 8,600 | 4,902 | 57 | 2,580 | 30 | 688 | 8 | 430 | 5 | Slight anisocytosis. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 8.20 | 75 | 4.160 | 8,000 | 3,840 | 48 | 3,680 | 46 | 480 | 6 | .. | .. | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Mon. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 9.10 | 75 | 4.240 | 9,000 | 4,950 | 55 | 3,150 | 35 | 630 | 7 | 270 | 3 | Considerable achromia and anisocy-tosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 8.05 | 70 | 4.416 | 11,200 | 4,928 | 44 | 5,488 | 49 | 448 | 4 | 336 | 3 | Do. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 8.35 | 80 | 4.536 | 8,800 | 4,752 | 54 | 3,520 | 40 | 528 | 6 | .. | .. | Normal. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 7.40 | 76 | 4.132 | 8,000 | 4,960 | 62 | 2,800 | 35 | 240 | 3 | .. | ... | Slight achromia. |
Mot. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 8.10 | 80 | 5.040 | 12,800 | 6,912 | 54 | 4,224 | 33 | 1,280 | 10 | 384 | 3 | Considerable achromia and anisocy-tosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 7.40 | 80 | 4.924 | 8,800 | 5,544 | 63 | 2,640 | 30 | 352 | 4 | 264 | 3 | Normal. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 7.25 | 81 | 4.400 | 8,200 | 4,428 | 54 | 3,116 | 38 | 328 | 4 | 328 | 4 | Do. |
Feb. 2, 1918... | 7.00 | 80 | 4.960 | 12,000 | 6,240 | 52 | 4,560 | 38 | 720 | 6 | 480 | 4 | Do. |
Pea. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 9.00 | 72 | 4.880 | 10,600 | 5,300 | 50 | 4,134 | 39 | 742 | 7 | 424 | 4 | Considerable achromia and anisocy-tosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 8.05 | 72 | 3.840 | 9,600 | 4,800 | 50 | 3,840 | 40 | 576 | 6 | 384 | 4 | Do. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 7.25 | 78 | 4.280 | 8,000 | 4,000 | 50 | 3,280 | 41 | 480 | 6 | 240 | 3 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 8.00 | 75 | 3.680 | 8,000 | 4,480 | 56 | 2,880 | 36 | 320 | 4 | 320 | 4 | Do. |
Pec. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 7.50 | 88 | 6.840 | 9,000 | 4,770 | 53 | 3,150 | 35 | 900 | 10 | 180 | 2 | Slight anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 7.15 | 86 | 4.456 | 5,400 | 2,592 | 48 | 2,484 | 46 | 324 | 6 | .. | .. | Normal. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 9.40 | 78 | 4.664 | 8,000 | 4,000 | 50 | 3,600 | 45 | 400 | 5 | ... | ... | Do. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 7.20 | 76 | 4.000 | 8,200 | 5,576 | 68 | 2,132 | 26 | 410 | 5 | 82 | 1 | Slight achromia. |
Tom. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 8.00 | 70 | 4.400 | 8,000 | 4,400 | 55 | 2,560 | 32 | 560 | 7 | 480 | 6 | Considerable achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 9.05 | 66 | 5.120 | 8,800 | 4,840 | 55 | 3,432 | 39 | 264 | 3 | 264 | 3 | Do. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 9.36 | 78 | 5.160 | 12,800 | 7,168 | 56 | 4,608 | 36 | 768 | 6 | 256 | 2 | Normal. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 7.00 | 80 | 4.508 | 12,800 | 7,488 | 59 | 4,512 | 35 | 544 | 4 | 256 | 2 | Do. |
Vea. | |||||||||||||
Dec. 19, 1917... | 8.40 | 92 | 4.408 | 7,000 | 3,920 | 56 | 2,170 | 31 | 420 | 6 | 490 | 7 | Slight achromia. |
Jan. 12, 1918... | 7.40 | 60 | 4.496 | 6,600 | 3,300 | 50 | 2,640 | 40 | 462 | 7 | 198 | 3 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 26, 1918... | 8.15 | 64 | 4.608 | 7,200 | 4,104 | 57 | 2,376 | 33 | 576 | 8 | 144 | 2 | Considerable achromia and anisocytosis. |
Feb. 2,1918... | 8.35 | 70 | 4.000 | 8,000 | 4,240 | 53 | 3,040 | 38 | 480 | 6 | 240 | 3 | Considerable achromia and slight anisocytosis. |
Average... | 76 | 4.504 | 9,460 | 5,245 | 55 | 3,409 | 36 | 576 | 6 | 222 | 2.3 | ||
1 Mast cells, 120 or 1 per cent.
2 Mast cells, 70 or 1 per cent.
3 Mast cells, 108 or 1 per cent.
Subject and date. | Time. | Hemoglobin. (Sahli). | Total erythrocytes. | Total leucocytes. | Polymorphonuclear neutrophiles. | Differential counts. | Eosino-philes. | Remarks on erythrocyte* | |||||
Lympho-cytes | Mono-nuclears | ||||||||||||
Total. | Per cent. | Total. | Per cent. | Total. | Per cent. | Total. | Per cent. | ||||||
Fis. | p. m. | p.ct | millions. | ||||||||||
Jan. 5. 19181. . | 7.45 | 86 | 5.754 | 8,000 | 4,000 | 50 | 2,720 | 34 | 800 | 10 | 320 | 4 | Normal. |
Jan. 13. 19182 .. | 6.50 | 85 | 4.842 | 12,800 | 8,192 | 64 | 3,968 | 31 | 384 | 3 | 128 | 1 | Do. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 7.40 | 85 | 5.216 | 10,400 | 5,200 | 50 | 4,680 | 45 | 520 | 5 | .... | .... | Do. |
Jan. 27. 1918... | 7.15 | 87 | 5.336 | 5,600 | 2,800 | 50 | 2,240 | 40 | 504 | 9 | 56 | 1 | Do. |
Ha*. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5, 19182 . . | 8.00 | 80 | 4.200 | 9,600 | 5,856 | 61 | 2,640 | 27.5 | 960 | 10 | 48 | 0.5 | Normal. |
Jan. 13. 1918... | 7.40 | 80 | 4.401 | 9,600 | 4,896 | 51 | 3,840 | 40 | 192 | 2 | 672 | 7 | Do. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 7.40 | 78 | 3.520 | 9,200 | 4,876 | 53 | 3,680 | 40 | 276 | 3 | 368 | 4 | Slight achromia. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 7.55 | 82 | 3.360 | 10,000 | 6,000 | 60 | 3,500 | 35 | 400 | 4 | 100 | 1 | Do. |
How. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 6. 1918... | 8.40 | 95 | 5.160 | 8,000 | 4,800 | 60 | 2,400 | 30 | 720 | 9 | 80 | 1 | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 7.40 | 85 | 4.120 | 6,000 | 3,840 | 64 | 1,860 | 31 | 240 | 4 | 60 | 1 | Slight anisocytosis. |
Jan. 19. 1918... | 8.20 | 72 | 4.288 | 8,000 | 4,480 | 56 | 3,200 | 40 | 320 | 4 | .. | .. | Slight anisocytosis and achromia. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 8.40 | 85 | 4.320 | 8,800 | 4,224 | 48 | 3,960 | 45 | 616 | 7 | .. | ... | Normal. |
Ham. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5,1918... | 8.24 | 90 | 4.576 | 8,000 | 4,960 | 62 | 2,240 | 28 | 560 | 7 | 240 | 3 | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 6.50 | 90 | 4.680 | 8,200 | 5,084 | 62 | 2,460 | 30 | 492 | 6 | 164 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 6.50 | 78 | 4.512 | 8,800 | 4,752 | 54 | 3,520 | 40 | 264 | 3 | 264 | 3 | Slight achmroia. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 7.35 | 87 | 5.496 | 7,600 | 3,420 | 45 | 3,268 | 43 | 608 | 8 | 304 | 4 | Normal. |
Kim. | |||||||||||||
Jan 5,1918... | 9.15 | 82 | 5.584 | 8,000 | 4,400 | 55 | 3,200 | 40 | 320 | 4 | 80 | 1 | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 8.40 | 84 | 4.672 | 8,800 | 4,136 | 47 | 3,784 | 43 | 704 | 8 | 176 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 19,1918... | 8.35 | 80 | 4.032 | 12,800 | 6,400 | 50 | 5,632 | 44 | 768 | 6 | .. | .. | Do. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 9.20 | 75 | 4.192 | 6,000 | 3,000 | 50 | 2,700 | 45 | 240 | 4 | 60 | 1 | Considerable achromia and anisocytosis. |
Lon. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 13, 1918... | 8.05 | 80 | 4.000 | 10,600 | 7,844 | 74 | 2,120 | 20 | 424 | 4 | 212 | 2 | Slight achromia. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 6.50 | 84 | 3.200 | 8,000 | 5,120 | 64 | 2,400 | 30 | 320 | 4 | 160 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 1 8.20 | 72 | 5.440 | 8,000 | 4,000 | 50 | 3,600 | 45 | 400 | 6 | .. | .. | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
SCH. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5, 1918... | 9.40 | 91 | 6.016 | 8,800 | 6,160 | 70 | 2,464 | 28 | 176 | 2 | .. | .. | Normal. |
Jan. 13,1918... | 8.20 | 80 | 4.800 | 8,000 | 5,440 | 68 | 2,080 | 26 | 320 | 4 | 160 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 7.15 | 79 | 3.392 | 6,600 | 4,092 | 62 | 2,112 | 32 | 264 | 4 | 132 | 2 | Slight achromia. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 8.40 | 80 | 3.760 | 6,000 | 3,600 | 60 | 2,100 | 35 | 300 | 5 | .. | .. | Slight achromia and aniaocytosis. |
Liv. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5, 1918... | 7.45 | 85 | 6.400 | 10,000 | 7,000 | 70 | 2,400 | 24 | 600 | 6 | .. | .. | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 8.20 | 82 | 5.666 | 9,600 | 6,144 | 64 | 2,688 | 28 | 576 | 6 | 192 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 19,1918... | 8.20 | 80 | 4.692 | 11,200 | 6,720 | 60 | 3,360 | 30 | 672 | 6 | 448 | 4 | Do. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 82 | 4.000 | 9,000 | 5,220 | 58 | 3,330 | 37 | 450 | 5 | .. | .. | Do. | |
Sne. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5, 1918... | 9.40 | 79 | 6.656 | 8,000 | 5,040 | 63 | 2,400 | 30 | 480 | 6 | 80 | 1 | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 8.40 | 78 | 4.772 | 8,800 | 5,104 | 58 | 3,344 | 38 | 352 | 4 | .. | .. | Slight achromia. |
Jan. 19,1918... | 8.00 | 75 | 4.608 | 10,400 | 6,448 | 62 | 3,536 | 34 | 208 | 2 | 208 | 2 | Slight achromia and aniaocytosis. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 7.55 | 75 | 4.280 | 5,200 | 3,016 | 58 | 1,768 | 34 | 312 | 6 | 104 | 2 | Considerable achromia. |
Tho. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5, 19184... | 9.15 | 92 | 5.892 | 10,000 | 6,600 | 66 | 2,200 | 22 | 1,000 | 10 | 100 | 1 | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 7.15 | 90 | 4.400 | 8,000 | 4,480 | 56 | 2,720 | 34 | 640 | 8 | 160 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 8.00 | 85 | 4.320 | 10,000 | 6,000 | 60 | 3,600 | 36 | 200 | 2 | 200 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 27. 1918... | 8.20 | 87 | 5.056 | 8,000 | 4,560 | 57 | 3,120 | 39 | 320 | 4 | Do. | ||
Van. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5,1918... | 8.24 | 88 | 5.480 | 9,000 | 5,670 | 63 | 2,610 | 29 | 540 | 6 | 180 | 2 | Normal. |
Jan.13,1918... | 8.05 | 85 | 4.920 | 8,800 | 5,016 | 57 | 3,168 | 36 | 352 | 4 | 264 | 3 | Do. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 9.00 | 80 | 4.056 | 7,200 | 4,320 | 60 | 2,160 | 30 | 576 | 8 | 144 | 2 | Do. |
Jan. 27,1918... | 7.35 | 76 | 4.800 | 8,000 | 4,800 | 60 | 2,720 | 34 | 320 | 4 | 160 | 2 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
WlL. | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5,1918... | 8.40 | 86 | 5.000 | 12,800 | 7,168 | 56 | 4,480 | 35 | 768 | 6 | 384 | 3 | Normal. |
Jan. 13, 1918... | 7.15 | 70 | 4.128 | 8,800 | 5,192 | 59 | 2,904 | 33 | 440 | 5 | 264 | 3 | Considerable achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 19, 1918... | 7.15 | 73 | 4.160 | 10,400 | 6,136 | 59 | 3,328 | 32 | 780 | 7.5 | 156 | 1.5 | Slight achromia and anisocytosis. |
Jan. 27, 1918... | 9.00 | 80 | 4.720 | 6,400 | 3,712 | 58 | 2,304 | 36 | 384 | 6 | Normal. | ||
Averages: | |||||||||||||
Normal diet - | |||||||||||||
Jan. 5, 1918.......... | 87 | 5.520 | 9,100 | 5,605 | 61 | 2,705 | 30 | 629 | 7 | 137 | 1.5 | ||
Reduced diet - | |||||||||||||
Jan.13-27,1918....... | 81 | 4.446 | 8,600 | 4,952 | 57 | 3,077 | 36 | 421 | 5 | 148 | 1.7 | ||
1 Mast cells, 160 or 2 per cent.
2 Mast cells, 128 or 1 per cent.
3 Mast cells, 96 or 1 per cent.
4 Mast cells, 100 or 1 per cent.
 
Continue to: