(s) Leroux v. Brown, 12 C. B. 801,14 Eng. L. & Eq. 247. See the case stated, post, vol. iii. p. * 57, n. (w)

(t) Bank of Galliopolis v. Trimble, 6 B. Mon. 599.

In some of our States, as in Iowa, Indiana, and Ohio, there are statute provisions that actions shall not be maintained in their courts, if they would have been barred by the statutes of limitations where the cause of action arose.

If one holds personal property by adverse title, long enough to acquire a title to it in that way by the law of prescription of the place where he holds it, and afterwards removes with the property to a place where the prescription necessary to give title is longer, the original owner cannot, as it seems, maintain his title in this new place, but is bound by the prescription of the former place. (u)